Should the feds limit states ability of civil forfeiture?

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled unanimously to limit the ability of state and local governments to seize property, including through the controversial practice of civil asset forfeiture.Voting 9-0, the justices found that the Constitution’s prohibition on excessive fines under the Eighth Amendment applies not only to the federal government but also to state and local authorities, and that practices such as civil asset forfeiture – where law enforcement can seize the property of anyone accused of criminal activity, regardless whether they’re convicted or even charged – run afoul of the restriction. Lars speaks with Bernie Giusto a retired Multnomah County Sheriff on this topic. Listen below.

SHARE

RELATED CONTENT

Should Nike guarantee sports contracts against the effects of childbirth? What are President Trump’s demands in response to Iran’s aggressive threats? Will the Cannabis Industry be taken over by agricultural and pharmaceutical giants? Do we know the actual number of illegal aliens currently living in the United States of America? The Ride-Sharing Revolution may be coming to an end in New York. An Evening With Lars On May 22 At The Black Pearl On The Columbia Event Center In Washougal, WA
Comments